Connect with us

Hot News

Mike Tyson, Katt Williams, DJ Whoo Kid Chop it up on Hotboxin’with Mike Tyson

Mike Tyson, Katt Williams, DJ Whoo Kid Chop it up on Hotboxin’with Mike Tyson

Published

on

Mike Tyson is a retired American professional boxer who is widely considered one of the greatest heavyweights in the history of the sport. He was born on June 30, 1966, in Brooklyn, New York.

Tyson made his professional debut as a boxer in 1985 and quickly rose to fame with his impressive speed, power, and technical ability. He became the youngest heavyweight champion in history in 1986, at the age of 20, and went on to hold the title for several years.

Throughout his career, Tyson was known for his aggressive style and intimidating presence in the ring. He was involved in several high-profile and controversial fights, including a 1997 bout with Evander Holyfield in which he was disqualified for biting Holyfield’s ear.

Advertisement

Katt Williams is an American stand-up comedian, actor, and rapper. He was born on September 2, 1971, in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Williams began his career as a stand-up comedian in the late 1990s and quickly gained popularity for his energetic and humorous performances. He has released several comedy specials and has appeared on numerous television shows and movies.

In addition to his work in comedy, Williams has also had a successful career as an actor, starring in films such as “Friday After Next,” “The Pimp Chronicles Pt. 1,” and “Norbit.” He has also released several rap albums under the name Money Mike.

Advertisement

DJ Whoo Kid is a American DJ and radio personality. He was born on October 12, 1972, in Queens, New York.

DJ Whoo Kid is best known for his work as a DJ on the radio station Hot 97 in New York City and as a mixtape DJ. He has released numerous mixtapes featuring a wide range of artists, including 50 Cent, Lil Wayne, and G-Unit.

In addition to his work as a DJ, Whoo Kid has also released several solo albums and has collaborated with other artists on a variety of projects. He has also worked as a record producer and a television host.

Advertisement

DJ Whoo Kid is known for his energetic and entertaining style and has gained a large following among fans of hip hop and urban music.

Tyson retired from professional boxing in 2005 and has since pursued a variety of interests, including acting and stand-up comedy. He remains a popular figure in the world of sports and entertainment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Hot News

REZONING A TRACT OF LAND COMMONLY KNOWN AS 44 FIRST STREET, FROM R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-2 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

REZONING A TRACT OF LAND COMMONLY KNOWN AS 44 FIRST STREET, FROM R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-2 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

Published

on

R-2 Two Family Residential District to C-2 Highway Commercial District

BILL NO. 3052-24 ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CAMDENTON, TITLE IV: ZONING
CODE, CHAPTER 400: ZONING REGULATIONS, SECTION 400.030: DISTRICT
BOUNDARIES, REZONING A TRACT OF LAND COMMONLY KNOWN AS 44 FIRST STREET,
FROM R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-2 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT SUBMITTED BY MARK MORRIS AND MARJORIE MORRIS
WHEREAS, Mark Morris and Marjorie Morris has made application for property fully described
in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance, to be rezoned from R-2 Two
Family Residential District to C-2 Highway Commercial District; and
WHEREAS, the City of Camdenton Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on
November 12, 2024 to consider this rezoning request; and
WHEREAS, the City of Camdenton Planning and Zoning Commission made the recommendation
at their November 12, 2024 meeting to recommend approval to the Board of Aldermen for the
second public hearing and final decision; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Aldermen held a public hearing on December 3, 2024 to consider the
rezoning request.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF
CAMDENTON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Code of the City of Camdenton, Section 400.030 – District Boundaries, is
hereby amended by changing the property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a
part of this ordinance from R-2 Two Family Residential District to C-2 – Highway Commercial
District.
Section 3. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Board
of Aldermen and approval by the Mayor.
Read the first time this _ day of December 2024. Read the second time and passed and approved this _ day of December 2024.


John D. McNabb, Mayor
ATTEST:


Renée Kingston, MMC/MPCC
Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Hot News

Mayor of Camdenton Explains why they don’t keep Complaint Report.

Mayor of Camdenton Explains why they don’t keep Complaint Report.

Published

on

Camdenton City Hall 12-3-24

However by integrating such a system, a city not only improves its operational efficiency but also enhances its relationship with its residents, fostering a community that feels valued and respected. A complaint system in a city is beneficial for several reasons:

  1. Accountability: It allows citizens to hold public officials and services accountable for their actions or inaction. By reporting issues, residents can ensure that problems are addressed, fostering a culture of responsibility among city officials.
  2. Service Improvement: Feedback through complaints can pinpoint areas where services are lacking or could be enhanced. This direct line of communication helps in prioritizing resource allocation and improving public services like sanitation, law enforcement, and infrastructure maintenance.
  3. Public Participation: It encourages civic engagement by giving residents a voice in local governance. When people feel heard, they are more likely to participate in community activities and support local initiatives.
  4. Data Collection: Complaints provide valuable data on recurring issues, which can help in urban planning and policy-making. This data can reveal trends or chronic issues that need systemic solutions rather than temporary fixes.
  1. Transparency: A well-managed complaint system can increase transparency in government operations. By making the complaint process and its outcomes public (while protecting privacy), cities can demonstrate how they handle grievances, thereby building trust with the community.
  2. Preventive Measures: By systematically addressing complaints, cities can prevent small issues from escalating into larger, more costly problems. For instance, timely repair of a pothole can prevent accidents and further road damage.
  3. Legal and Ethical Compliance: It ensures that the city adheres to legal standards and ethical practices, as complaints can highlight where the city might be falling short in terms of compliance with laws or ethical conduct.
  4. Enhancing Quality of Life: Ultimately, an effective complaint system can lead to a better quality of life for residents by ensuring that their living environment is maintained and improved in response to their needs and concerns.
Continue Reading

Hot News

Taxpayer Dollars Abroad: A Deep Dive into U.S. Military Spending with Questionable Returns

Published

on

In an era where economic prudence is preached, the U.S. federal government’s expenditure on foreign military financing (FMF) and other international support programs continues to spark debate. With the U.S. budget for 2024 stretching into trillions, a significant chunk, specifically 54% of discretionary spending, is allocated to defense, including substantial outlays for foreign military aid. Yet, questions linger about the tangible benefits these investments bring back to American taxpayers.

The United States supports over 150 countries annually through various military aid programs, with Foreign Military Financing (FMF) being one of the largest. In fiscal year 2023, the U.S. spent approximately $6.1 trillion, with defense activities alone accounting for 13% of this budget – around $820 billion. A considerable portion of this defense budget doesn’t end with domestic military operations but extends into foreign lands through programs like FMF, IMET (International Military Education and Training), and Peacekeeping Operations (PKO).

Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force Gen. CQ Brown, Jr., hold a press conference about the Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting in Brussels.
Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force Gen. CQ Brown, Jr., hold a press conference about the Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting in Brussels.

Israel tops the list, receiving about $3.3 billion annually, followed by Egypt with $1.3 billion. Jordan secures around $425 million each year. These allocations are intended to secure strategic partnerships, promote stability, and ensure access to military bases or intelligence-sharing. However, the return on these investments for American taxpayers often seems opaque.

Navy Adm. Timothy J. Keating, commander, U.S. Pacific Command, reviews the honor guard of the Royal Brunei Armed Forces during a welcome ceremony on April 8 at the Ministry of Defense in Brunei. Keating met with numerous senior defense and foregin affairs officials during his first trip to Brunei. (U.S. Navy photo/Petty Officer 2nd Class Elisia V. Gonzales)

The International Military Education and Training program, while less costly, still impacts over 100 countries, with each receiving from tens of thousands to a few million dollars. This program aims at fostering goodwill and ensuring that foreign militaries align with U.S. military practices and doctrines, potentially influencing future arms sales or alliances.

Advertisement

Critics argue that these investments yield little in terms of direct benefits to U.S. citizens. For instance, the support for countries like Pakistan, which has historically received significant funding under the Coalition Support Funds for counter-terrorism efforts, has been marred by allegations of corruption and ineffective use of funds. Recent discussions on X have highlighted concerns over money laundering within these aid programs, suggesting that the money might not even reach its intended military purposes.

Moreover, military aid to Ukraine, while politically and morally justified by many, has also been subject to scrutiny. With over $70 billion in aid, including both military and economic support, the U.S. has been a primary backer in the conflict against Russia. However, there are growing concerns about the oversight of this aid, with some questioning whether the funds are being used effectively or if they’re leading to corruption or just arming another country’s military without strategic returns for the U.S.

U.S. Navy Hospital Corpsman 3rd Class William DeBruler, an Illinois native and corpsman with Combat Logistics Battalion 6, Combat Logistics Regiment 2, 2nd Marine Logistics Group, provides security during Exercise Nordic Response 24 in Alta, Norway
U.S. Navy Hospital Corpsman 3rd Class William DeBruler, an Illinois native and corpsman with Combat Logistics Battalion 6, Combat Logistics Regiment 2, 2nd Marine Logistics Group, provides security during Exercise Nordic Response 24 in Alta, Norway, March 11, 2024. Exercise Nordic Response 24 is designed to enhance military capabilities and allied cooperation in high-intensity warfighting scenarios under challenging arctic conditions, while providing U.S. Marines unique opportunities to train alongside NATO allies and partners. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Christian Salazar)

From an economic perspective, the benefits are debated. While military spending can stimulate the U.S. defense industry, ensuring jobs and maintaining technological superiority, the direct benefits to the average taxpayer are less clear. The U.S. spends more on defense than the next 11 countries combined, yet the economic return on this investment is often questioned, especially when considering the opportunity cost of not investing in domestic infrastructure, education, or health care.

Strategically, the U.S. aims to maintain global influence, counter adversaries like China and Russia, and secure allies. However, the effectiveness of this strategy is debated. For example, the U.S. commitment to countries like Saudi Arabia, despite human rights concerns, has been criticized, especially when considering the limited diplomatic leverage gained in return for military support.

Advertisement
U.S. Marine Corps Lt. Gen. John Allen, deputy commander U.S. Central Command, talks with Qatari Foregin Minister Affairs assitant for follow up affairs, Sheik Mohammad Al-Rhmaihi, before the start of the ribbon cutting ceremony to comemorate the official opening of the U.S. Central Command forward headquarters here Oct. 22, at Al Udeid AB, Qatar.

(DoD Photo by USAF SSgt Bradley A. Lail) (released)
U.S. Marine Corps Lt. Gen. John Allen, deputy commander U.S. Central Command, talks with Qatari Foregin Minister Affairs assitant for follow up affairs, Sheik Mohammad Al-Rhmaihi, before the start of the ribbon cutting ceremony to comemorate the official opening of the U.S. Central Command forward headquarters here Oct. 22, at Al Udeid AB, Qatar. (DoD Photo by USAF SSgt Bradley A. Lail) (released)

The narrative isn’t just about dollars and cents but about the moral and ethical implications of supporting regimes or engaging in conflicts with little direct impact on American lives or security. Moreover, with economic challenges at home, many taxpayers are questioning why such significant funds are directed overseas when domestic issues persist.

The debate over U.S. taxpayer money spent on foreign military financing without much return is complex, involving geopolitical strategy, economic considerations, and ethical questions. While the U.S. has undoubtedly influenced global events through its military aid, the direct benefits to the American public remain a point of contention. As the U.S. approaches the next fiscal year, with a new administration on the horizon, the conversation about where and how to spend taxpayer dollars will undoubtedly intensify, with many advocating for a reevaluation of these international commitments in favor of domestic priorities.

Army Gen. Daniel Hokanson, chief of the National Guard Bureau, spoke wiht members and guests of the Council on Foreign Relations Nov. 14 at the Harold Pratt House in New York City. Hokanson, a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, oversees the National Guard's State Partnership Program, which includes formalized partnerships with more than half of the world's nations. The Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization focused on being a resource for its members, public and private leaders, and citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. (Air National Guard photo by Capt. Jon LaDue)
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Missourinetwork.tv | BigPlanetMedia