Connect with us

Hot News

Tik Tok under attack by the United States Congress, but why open opt-in data sources are every…. plus it’s on in the fine print…

Tik Tok under attack by the United States Congress, but why open opt-in data sources are every…. plus it’s on in the fine print…

Published

on

The issue of cross-border data sharing has become increasingly important in today’s globalized world. With the rise of the digital age, personal data has become a valuable commodity that can be easily transferred across borders. However, this raises concerns about privacy and data protection, particularly in cases where data is transferred from one country to another. In this paper, we will explore the importance of privacy between countries, citing examples of court cases where it was deemed necessary for the data to remain within the country of origin.

Case Study 1: Schrems II vs. Facebook In the Schrems II case, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that the Privacy Shield agreement, which allowed the transfer of personal data from the European Union (EU) to the United States (US), was invalid. The court cited concerns about the US government’s access to personal data, as well as the lack of legal remedies for EU citizens in the US. As a result, companies such as Facebook were required to store personal data within the EU, rather than transferring it to the US.

This case demonstrates the importance of privacy between countries, particularly in cases where there are significant differences in data protection laws and government surveillance practices. It also highlights the need for legal remedies to be in place for individuals in cases where their privacy has been compromised.

Advertisement

Case Study 2: Canada vs. Facebook In 2019, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) found that Facebook had violated Canadian privacy laws by allowing third-party apps to access users’ personal data without their consent. The OPC ordered Facebook to implement several measures to improve its data protection practices, including obtaining users’ express consent for the collection, use, and disclosure of their personal information.

This case demonstrates the importance of privacy within a country, as well as the need for companies to adhere to local data protection laws. It also highlights the role of government agencies in enforcing these laws and protecting the privacy of citizens.

Case Study 3: China vs. Apple In 2018, the Chinese government passed a cybersecurity law that required companies to store Chinese citizens’ personal data within the country. Apple complied with this law by storing iCloud data within China, despite concerns about government surveillance and censorship. However, this decision was criticized by human rights groups, who argued that it could enable the Chinese government to access users’ personal data.

Advertisement

This case demonstrates the complex nature of cross-border data sharing, particularly in cases where there are significant differences in data protection laws and government surveillance practices. It also highlights the need for companies to balance the demands of local laws with the privacy rights of their users.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Hot News

Flock Camera System Put Back Up, Despite Camden County Ban

Published

on

In a twist to the story, as of 1:09 PM on January 16, 2024, a truck was spotted on the scene reinstalling another camera to the same pole from which Commisoner Skelton is alleged to have removed the previous one, indicating a quick response by either the state department or possibly Flock Group to reinstate their surveillance equipment.,

– Camden County Presiding Commissioner Ike Skelton finds himself at the center of a legal storm after reportedly taking down a license plate reader (LPR) system installed by Flock Group, Inc., on Highway 54 near D-Road. The incident, which has sparked a debate over privacy versus public safety, occurred just days ago, leading to an ongoing investigation by local authorities.

According to reports, Skelton was observed by a Missouri Highway Patrol trooper in the act of removing the surveillance equipment from its pole. The trooper immediately notified both the Camden County Sheriff’s Office and the Highway Patrol, prompting the latter to take charge of the investigation. This action follows a contentious ordinance passed by the Camden County Commission in January 2024, which banned all automated license plate readers within the unincorporated areas of the county, citing concerns over privacy and potential violations of constitutional rights.

Skelton, an advocate for limited government and individual liberty, has been vocal about his opposition to such surveillance technologies. His stance has previously led to public disputes, including a notable disagreement with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives over firearm permit information sharing. The recent incident with the LPR system is seen by some as an extension of his commitment to protecting residents’ privacy rights, while others view it as an overstep of authority.

Advertisement

The Flock camera in question was part of a study agreement with the Missouri Department of Public Safety, aimed at assessing the effectiveness of license plate reader technology in criminal investigations. Critics argue that these cameras are essential tools for law enforcement, enabling quick identification of stolen vehicles or vehicles associated with criminal activity. However, supporters of Skelton’s actions highlight the potential for misuse of such extensive surveillance capabilities, questioning the balance between security and personal freedoms.

The investigation continues without clear indications of whether charges will be filed. The legal implications could set a precedent for how local governments interact with state or private surveillance initiatives, especially in areas where local ordinances conflict with broader public safety efforts.

The Camden County Sheriff’s Office, alongside the Missouri Department of Public Safety, is expected to release more details as the investigation progresses. Meanwhile, the community remains divided, with debates on social media and local forums reflecting the broader national conversation about surveillance, privacy, and law enforcement’s role in modern society.

Continue Reading

Hot News

Iowa vs. Missouri: Music City Bowl 2024

Published

on

NASHVILLE, Tenn. – The stage is set for a classic Big Ten versus SEC showdown as the Iowa Hawkeyes prepare to take on the Missouri Tigers in the 2024 Music City Bowl at Nissan Stadium. With kickoff scheduled for 1:30 PM CT on Monday, December 30, the betting community has its eyes glued to the latest odds and predictions.

Missouri steps onto the field as the slight favorite, with the spread sitting at -2.5 points, according to recent updates. The game’s over/under is set at a conservative 40.5 points, hinting at a potential defensive battle. This matchup pits two teams with contrasting end-of-season narratives; Missouri aims for a second straight 10-win season, while Iowa looks to close out the year on a positive note despite dealing with key player opt-outs for the NFL Draft and the transfer portal.

Predictions are leaning towards Missouri covering the spread, with analysts citing the Tigers’ offensive firepower, even without star receiver Luther Burden III, who has opted out to prepare for the draft. Missouri’s quarterback, Brady Cook, is expected to lead the charge, showcasing his resilience after returning from a mid-season injury.

On the other side, Iowa faces challenges with the absence of their star running back, Kaleb Johnson, who has also opted out. However, fans and bettors are reminded of Iowa’s defensive tradition, which could keep them in the game despite offensive shortcomings.

Advertisement

The betting line has seen some movement, with sharps reportedly favoring Iowa at +3.5 points, suggesting confidence in the Hawkeyes’ ability to keep it close or potentially upset the Tigers.

As the clock ticks down to game day, both teams are expected to bring their A-game in what is anticipated to be a low-scoring, hard-fought battle in Nashville. Fans and bettors alike will be watching closely to see if Missouri can leverage their slight favorite status or if Iowa can defy the odds with their defense-first strategy.

For those looking to place a wager or simply follow the action, this Music City Bowl promises to be a testament to the strategic depth and competitive spirit of college football.

Continue Reading

Hot News

Threat received at School of the Osage Middle School

Published

on

Osage Beach, MO – On 12/19/2024, at approximately 3:12 p.m. the Osage Beach Police Department received a call from School of the Osage Officials regarding a threat received by staff at the Middle School. Our School Resource Officer along with additional Osage Beach Officers, Detectives and Officers from the Miller County Sheriff’s Office and the Missouri

Highway Patrol responded to the Middle School Campus to assist.
The decision was made to delay dismissal until sufficient manpower was on scene to ensure the students and staff’s safety.


The initial investigation revealed that there was no active threat to school, however there is an active investigation being conducted by the Osage Beach Police Department. If the individual(s) responsible for this act are identified, they will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 Missourinetwork.tv | BigPlanetMedia